Chapter 4. Energy Conservation
Let us consider the net energy in a unit time passing the sphere of a radius $r$, $L(r)$, or $L(m)$.
In the shell $[r,r+\text dr]$, or $[m,m+\text dm]$
If no energy generation/absorption
Eulerian picture: fixed fluid position
∂r∂L=0Lagrange's picture: the coordinates move with mass
∂m∂L=0In astrophysics, Lagrange's picture is usually adopted. One example is the perturbation theory.
In the perturbation theory, people usually consider a mass element with certain thermaldynamical quantities, such as $\rho$, $T$, $P$, etc. As the mass element moves, the change in each quantity can be easily characterized with its partial derivative with respect to $m$. Important applications include
Stellar pulsation
Tidal perturbation of NS/WD and the gravitational radiation (GW)
If the energy is generated by nuclear burning
dL=4πr2ρdr⋅εnucwhere $\varepsilon_\text{nuc}$ is the energy generation rate per unit mass. Then
∂m∂L=εnucand
ΔE=Δmc2∼Δt∫0MεnucdmIf the energy is used to increase the internal energy and/or expand/contract a mass shell
The first law in thermodynamics requires
de+Pd(ρ1)=Tds⇒∂t∂e+P∂t∂(ρ1)=T∂t∂swe $s$ is the specific entropy. Thus
∂m∂L=εnuc−T∂t∂s≡εnuc+εgasFor contraction, $\varepsilon\text{gas}>0$, or expansion, $\varepsilon\text{gas}<0$. Therefore, if there is no nuclear burning, $\partial L/\partial m=\varepsilon_\text{gas}$, and the total luminosity is given by
L=∫0M∂m∂Ldm=−∫0Mdm[∂t∂e+P∂t∂(ρ1)]=−dtdEint−∫0MP∂t∂(ρ1)dmFrom the perspective of energy conservation, the second term should correspond to the time derivative of $E_\text{g}$. Now we give a proof.
The virial theorem reveals that
Eg=−3∫0MρPdmThe time derivative is thus
dtdEg=−3∫0M[∂t∂Pρ1+P∂t∂(ρ1)]dmWe just need to prove
−3∫0M[+P∂t∂(ρ1)]dm=∫0MP∂t∂(ρ1)dm⇐3P∂t∂(ρ1)+4∂t∂Pρ1=0⟺3∂t∂ln(1/ρ)+4∂t∂lnP=4∂t∂lnP−3∂t∂lnρ=0⟺∂t∂ln(ρ4/3P)=0This is true for the radiation-dominated case, where
P∝ρ4/3Finally, we have derived
L=−dtd(Eint+Eg)simply assuming spherical symmetry, hydrostatic equilibrium in radiation-dominated fluid.
If neutrinos carry energy away, we have to somehow modify our equation
∂m∂L=εnuc+εgas−ενNeutrinos hardly interact with matter. The typical cross section for neutrino scattering is $\sigma\nu\sim10^{-44}$ cm$^{2}$, about 20 orders of magnitude smaller than the cross section of Thomson scattering. Take the Sun as an example, the mean free path $l\text{mfp}$ of neutrinos in the Sun is
lmfp,ν=nσν1∼1019−20 cm>1 AU≫R⊙As a result, neutrinos produced in the Sun escape without any scattering. They can be treated as an energy sink in stars.
Total Energy Conservation of a Star
The energy conservation law of the whole star is
where the nuclear energy $E_\text{nuc}$ is given by
On the other hand,
Energy Source of the Sun
Nuclear timescale
is the timescale of continuous, stable nuclear burning in a star. Considering the hydrogen fusion
where $Q$ stands for the available energy per unit mass.
For the Sun,
Recall that
This is usually the case for a normal, stable star.
What Powers Our Sun?
The energy conversion efficiency of the Sun is approximately
According to radioactive elements in comets, the age of our system is at least $\sim 10$ Gyr.
Gravity
Q∼M⊙Eg∼R⊙GM⊙=2×1015 erg/sConsidering the energy conversion efficiency, the Sun would be burnt out after
tg∼1015 s∼102 MyrNot enough!
Chemical Reaction
For hydrogen atoms, $E\sim13.6$ eV, so
Q∼mp13.6 eV=1013 erg/g⇒tchem<1 MyrNot enough!
Nuclear Burning
tnuc∼102 GyrSufficient!
Last updated