Chapter 3. Virial Theorem
Last updated
Last updated
In a star, where hydrostatic equilibrium is achieved, two important energy reservoirs are connected,
Starting from
In normal cases (main sequence stars), $P_0=0$.
For an evolved star, the stellar core is embedded in an envelope. At the surface of the star, $p_0\neq0$.
Thus
The RHS can be interpreted as the gravitational potential energy.
The gravitational energy is always negative.
Thus if we combine the LHS and the RHS, we obtain the virial theorom
Recall that we have only two assumptions
spherical gas
hydrostatic equilibrium
without considering any detail of the gas.
If we further assume ideal gas EoS
where $c_P$ and $c_V$ are specific heat capacity at constant pressure and volume, respectively. For ideal gas, the second equation was derived by Julius von Mayer and is known as Mayer's relation. $c_P$ and $c_V$ are related by
where $\gamma$ is the heat capacity ratio, as well as the adiabatic index. $\gamma=5/3$ for mono-atomic gas.
Finally, the specific internal energy for ideal gas is simply
Therefore
And the virial theorem can be expressed as
where $E_\text{int}$ corresponds to the total internal energy within a star.
For $\gamma=5/3$, $E\text{int}=-E\text g/2$.
Virial theorem directly links the total gravitational energy to the total internal energy of a star without knowing its detailed internal structure. Consider a more tightly bound star, whose $E_\text g$ is more negative, then it must be hotter to obtain corresponding internal energy.
Now we can revisit the temperature of the Sun.
So the mean temperature of the Sun is
Given $\gamma=5/3$ and $\alpha\sim1$, $\bar T\sim4\times10^6$ K.
If $\gamma=5/3$, $E\text{tot}=E\text g/2<0$, so the star is safely bound.
If $\gamma\to4/3+$ (slightly over $4/3$), $E_\text{tot}$ is only sightly below zero, and the star is weakly bound.
For a massive star, where radiation pressure dominates, $\gamma\sim4/3$.
For cases where relativistic degenerate electron pressure donimates, such as a relativistic white dwarf, $\gamma\sim4/3$.
$\gamma=4/3$ is one critical condition for the onset of star formation, or in other word, the onset of hydrodynamics.
Let us consider a contracting star (fix the mass and lower the radius).
If the contracting timescale is long enough, the star can still be well approximated by hydrostatic equilibrium. In this way the energy loss rate in a unit time, that is, the luminosity, is given by
while
So half of the gravitational energy loss is used for providing luminosity $L$. The other half is used to increase the internal energy (temperature). In other words, energy loss promotes $T$.
The heat capacity is negative!
Now we can estimate the time it takes for the gravitational energy released by this so-called Kelvin-Holmholtz mechanism to be carried to the surface
This timescale is known as the Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale.
KH timescale for the sun
The free-fall timescale $t_\text{ff}$ is $\sim 10^3$ s, so the Sun achieves hydrostatic equilibrium quickly, and our former approximation is reasonable.
KH timescale for star formation
Originally we have a molecular cloud with typical number density $\bar n\sim 10^4$ cm$^{-3}$.
So mostly within the free-fall time, the molecular cloud is dominated by hydrodynamics, until it reaches a stage where the density gets higher and the contraction slows down. It then becomes quasi-hydrostatic, when the Kelvin-Helmholtz mechanism starts to dominate. The KH timescale is about $10^7$ yr. As the contraction goes on, the temperature keeps rising. This quasi-hydrostatic state halts when the central temperature $T_c\sim10^7$ K, high enough to trigger nuclear burning.